swfchan: 3.swf (info)

Text

TIME HAS NO EMOTION
an attempted debunking of
Aquarius: The Age of Evil
By Anonymous
Version zero (there's always room for
improvement).

PART THREE

Communism:
(5) It will be a command economy."
(Government planners decide which goods
and services are produced and how they
are distributed.)(93)
Zeitgeist:
(5) "Distribution of goods and services
without the use of money or tokens would
be accomplished by establishing
distribution centers. These centers would
be similar to expositions, where the
advantages of new products are explained
and demonstrated. Exhibition centers will
display what is new and available and will
constantly be updated." (Instead of
Government planners it will be technicians
and systems analyst's who decide).(94)

So as you can see a side by side
comparison between the communist
model and the Zeitgeist model (resource
based economy, why is the term Zeitgeist
model used?) shows how similar the
concepts are.

How similar is the accuracy of a human
decision compared with a computer decision?
The role switching technicians will play in this
system will be in conjunction with heavily
accurate computer AI. The similarity
presented only goes so far, and it's an
understatement to leave open the vague
assumption that communism is strongly
similar to the venus project. A computer given
all available information is able to carry out an
operation better than a human, and it will
continuously get better than a human. Human
decisions aren't able to keep up with a
computer's processing power to continuously
make super accurate decisions. When I type
on my keyboard, every key I press the
computer processes a set of binary numbers
which equate to a certain letter. Example K=
01001011. The calculation ability computers
have is superior to humans.
What human can process a set of 8 binary
digits instantly in every letter of a word that is
said?
The word "continue" for example =
011000110110111101101110011101000110100101
1011100111010101100101

No-one! So it's logical to say that computers
will be able to strongly help with important
decisions in the future. I fail to see how this is
a bad thing even if in a certain way it may
resemble a part of Communism. Also we don't
want to simply decide which goods and
services are produced, we want to investigate
to find out which goods and services are most
vital and required. Also we want to investigate
the most effective way to distribute these
goods, and use that method, we don't want to
decide based on what we think the best way
they can be distributed. Making logical
conclusions is not the same as having
arbitrary opinions.

Communism:
(3) "Social classes will not exist."(89)
Zeitgeist:
(3) "The process which has been going on
for centuries, if not millennia, religion,
patriotism, race, wealth, class and every
other form of arbitrary separatist
identification thus conceived has served
to create a controlled population utterly
malleable in the hands of the few."(90)

Saying a separatist has good intentions would
be like saying cancer has good intentions. We
want to mend that train of thought. We are
connected to nature in ways that are not
immediately visible, so we assume that we
don't apply to nature's laws or we can rise
above them. Our connection to nature needs
to be maintained as harmonious.
I don't see how saying that is bad.

That quote is from part 3! One of the parts
you apparently didn't have an issue with.
I have no real issue with the last two
sections.

2012: A Clever Deception.
It must be reinforced that time has no
emotion. The only way a 2012 doomsday or
any manufactured fear event will happen is by
the manifestation of fear into matter, which is
why the causes for negative aspects of our
society should be aimed to be cleared, turning
the cancer tap off instead of continuously
looking its flowage. Disaster only happens if it
is allowed.

KeithTruth/Keith Thompson (with eerie
ambient drone in the background)
"The same new agers who call for peace,
love, harmony, world unity when
confronted with separatists for example
fundamentalist Christians you start to see
a darker side to them. They do not
appreciate people who will no adopt their
new age views. For example a major new
age figure David Spangler who was in a
group known as planetary citizens which
was a UN group stating something to the
effect of we can take all the marshmallows
all the scriptures all the tablets and have a
jolly good bonfire. So essentially he's
promoting the abolition of these faiths.

You could turn that around the other way and
say religious extremists are intolerant of other
religions, atheists and dislike how they will not
adopt their religious views. What's clear to me
is when you get an inaccurate idea in your
head like 1+1=5, no matter how much you
believe 1+1=5 it always is equal to 2 no matter
how much you believe otherwise.

That's the danger I feel from a religious
extremist, they'll take a scared writing word for
word as true without any concern of possible
direct contradictions within the teachings.
For example, apparently in Christianity you
have the teaching love thy neighbour -
implying solve your problems through love
and try to refrain from treating conflictions with
hate, the idea is to find a balance.
Then (this will need to be checked) you have
a teaching where it is okay to stone a child if
he/she is disobedient. Call me insane but
that's a contradiction. That's why I'll find it
difficult to understand someone who takes
teachings where some are good natured and
help a situation (which is good of course) but
then ones that corrupt it which completely
dissolves the good natured teachings. I'd
want to enlighten them as to what is corrupt
and what is not in their own religion, because
what is better? Having a belief system or a
system that can extract and apply facts?
Wouldn't it be beneficial to point out
corruptions in a religion so that they can be
revised? Or is the universe seriously telling us
to stone children?

Another classic example is idea that god
loves us at the same time god is angry and
wants to punish us. The definition of mind
control is a system that suppresses the ability
to see contradictions and corruptions within
what you've been told. To allow what you've
been programmed as true to control you and
to disregard your ability to process data in a
way that checks whether it's following the
pure teaching of love thy neighbour and love
your enemies. In other words you shouldn't
need a bible to think; how much is the
information I'm sending/receiving coinciding
with the teaching love thy neighbour? The
bible is apparently this thick and wise book
but does it mention to make sure to do that
somewhere in it?

GOD LOVES YOU

BUT GOD HATES YOU.

If you cannot understand the contradiction I'm
talking about you're allowing yourself to be
controlled.

Love does not want to punish your actions. It
wants to help. Punishment breeds fear, which
is like breeding cancer.

When a programmer writes code, he/she
doesn't have any desire to keep mistakes in it.
The idea is to improve and revise the writing
skills. Saying we want to keep contradictory
beliefs is like saying we want to keep an old
buggy piece of software that doesn't really
work at all when compared to a new version.

The reason we need to move out of
separatism is because we need to stop
fooling around by denying the fundamentals
that we all have in common. We are all
separate human beings yes, but the
fundaments that make us similar needs to be
respected. That is my understanding of the
phrase we are all one.
As mentioned before our fundamentals needs
are
Breathable air
Food and water
Shelter
Constant need to update knowledge
Effective transportation
Efficient energy
Peaceful/safe/productive environment

How is it not beneficial to everyone to attempt
to encourage a direction that takes care of
everyone? This is the message that's
conveyed to me through various tactics, TZM
is bad because this and this. This social
system doesn't take care of everyone; it takes
care of the selected. So shouldn't the goal be
to move into a social system that does care
for everyone?
Separatism to me reminds me of cancer.
Cancer is a growth that has become separate
from the rest of the body through some kind of
damage and tries to go off on its own. The
end result is it kills the body and itself. If you
can understand my comparison between
separatism and cancer you can understand
why I don't think separatism is a good
direction.

Narration
"Say this prayer with me and become a
true child of god. Lord Jesus Christ, I ask
you to come into my heart as Lord. I
accept what you do for me on the cross
dying for my sin. I repent of my sin and I
wish to live a life for you. Following your
teachings found in the New TestamentTM.
Please forgive me of my wicked ways and
transform me into a child of God. I pray in
Jesus' mighty name amen (So be it)."

If Jesus is somewhere magically in this reality
right now and he wants to help people,
wouldn't he attempt to regardless if people
prayed to him or not? Why would he care or
why would he want/require credit towards
him? The idea of Jesus wanting you to
respect him as a lord or master is the same as
a government desiring the public to respect
authority. Why would he want to own a
teaching like love thy neighbourTM? The
whole idea behind a selfless act is you don't
care about credit of your good actions. Why
would he say "oh I'm not helping you because
you didn't pray to me even though I'm meant
to be one of the good guys." it makes no
sense, and prayer sounds like a method of
promoting cancerous attitudes.
Hypothetically if there's someone who's on fire
yet there is a scared religious teaching that
says don't put people out if they're on fire do
you obey that teaching?
Well hopefully I've debunked some of the
accusations with some sound logic. Don't
follow a prophet, don't blindly follow your
opinion/heart, follow sound logic, love/respect
your enemies and finally stay balanced.

Music By:

Saying you own a song is similar to
saying you own Musical NotesTM, you
discover pleasing patterns and nothing
more.

Anonymous
1. Having no known name or identity or
known source.
We are all originally nothing meaning we all
are truly anonymous. This video was made
anonymously because the creator of the film
this video talks about is known to demonise
people who criticise his films, and I didn't want
to allow hate to be bred from this film in that
way, (moreover I don't like hate to be bred).
You can't criticise anonymous because there's
no-one to criticise. Focus on the accuracy of
information, it is true if it coincides with the
teachings of love thy neighbour, love your
enemies, and care for all variables.

This has been a property is comedy
production.

OMG is your brain workin'?

Library Items

Symbol 1 Font	Used by:3
Symbol 2 Font	Used by:8 9 10 12 13 14 16 17 18 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 39 40 41
Symbol 3 Text	Uses:1	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 4 Font	Used by:5
Symbol 5 Text	Uses:4	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 6 Font	Used by:7 8 11 13 14 15 22 26 34 42
Symbol 7 Text	Uses:6	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 8 Text	Uses:6 2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 9 Text	Uses:2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 10 Text	Uses:2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 11 Text	Uses:6	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 12 Text	Uses:2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 13 Text	Uses:2 6	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 14 Text	Uses:6 2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 15 Text	Uses:6	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 16 Text	Uses:2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 17 Text	Uses:2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 18 Text	Uses:2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 19 Bitmap	Used by:20
Symbol 20 Graphic	Uses:19	Used by:21
Symbol 21 MovieClip	Uses:20	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 22 Text	Uses:6	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 23 Bitmap	Used by:24
Symbol 24 Graphic	Uses:23	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 25 Graphic	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 26 Text	Uses:6	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 27 Bitmap	Used by:28
Symbol 28 Graphic	Uses:27	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 29 Text	Uses:2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 30 Text	Uses:2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 31 Text	Uses:2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 32 Text	Uses:2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 33 Text	Uses:2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 34 Text	Uses:6 2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 35 Text	Uses:2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 36 Text	Uses:2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 37 Bitmap	Used by:38
Symbol 38 Graphic	Uses:37	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 39 Text	Uses:2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 40 Text	Uses:2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 41 Text	Uses:2	Used by:Timeline
Symbol 42 Text	Uses:6	Used by:Timeline
Streaming Sound 1	Used by:Timeline